What a recurring workflow actually costs

A full-time role runs about 2,080 hours a year, which works out to 40 hours a week. That number does not care how the hours are distributed. Eight hours a day from one person and ninety minutes a day from five people cost you the same thing. Once a recurring workflow crosses 40 hours a week across everyone who touches it, you are funding a full-time position that produces no new work.

Most operators never run that number, because the hours are spread thin enough to look like ordinary overhead.

Seven things to look for

01

The same information gets typed in twice

Someone reads a value out of one system and types it into another. Re-keying is where errors enter, and the errors cost more to find than the typing cost to do.

02

It has a standing block on someone's calendar

When work gets scheduled, it has stopped being a task and become a job. Look for the recurring block that nobody questions anymore.

03

One person is the only one who can do it

There is a name attached to the process. When that person takes a week off, the work either stops or somebody spends a day relearning it from scratch.

04

You have shopped for software and nothing fits

Off-the-shelf tools handle about 80% of how you work. The last 20% is where your margin lives, and it is the part no vendor is going to build for you.

05

The error rate is already budgeted for

Nobody is alarmed by the mistakes anymore. There is a rework step, a double-check, or a person whose job partly consists of catching what the process gets wrong.

06

Volume and headcount move together

Every time order volume goes up, you add a person. If your growth plan reads like a hiring plan, there is no leverage anywhere in the process.

07

You asked what a custom build would cost and the number ended the conversation

Quotes for this kind of work run into the hundreds of thousands of dollars, on timelines measured in quarters. That number is honest for the way most firms build. It is worth knowing that a smaller and faster path exists, because I have been on both sides of that quote.

What is this workflow costing you?

Pick one recurring process and answer three questions. The numbers update as you type, and nothing is sent anywhere.

0
hours a year
0
full-time roles
$0
a year

For reference: the system I built at Gem Awards, the company where I work, gives the team back roughly 240 hours a month. That is about 55 hours a week, or 1.3 full-time roles. When someone left, the role was never backfilled.

If three or more of these describe the same workflow, it is worth an hour.

Bring the process. I will tell you honestly whether it is worth automating, and what it would take. If the answer is that you should not build it, I will say that too.

Book a Free AI Session →